fix(M8): corrections d'audit FIXME_M8 — appariement, date, déterminisme, validateur
Quatre corrections bloquantes/majeures de l'audit FIXME_M8 : - Appariement un-à-un déterministe (consommation du candidat sélectionné) ; 1 réel / 2 théoriques → 1 REMOVED, 2 réels / 1 théorique → 1 ADDED. - Filtrage strict par date : les cours réels hors target_date sont exclus du matching avec un warning logé (décision architecte : pas d'exception). - Déterminisme des détails : formatage via sorted(set(...)) au lieu de set(...) brut, indépendant de PYTHONHASHSEED. - Validateur AgendaChange strict : ADDED = lesson seule, REMOVED = theoretical_lesson seule, MODIFIED = les deux requis. - Comparaison à la minute près dans _is_modified (cohérent avec _matches). - Documentation §8.4/§8.5 alignée avec l'implémentation (tolérance 15 min, API compare(), normalize_subject référencé, appariement consommé). Co-authored-by: opencode/coder <coder@agents.invalid> Co-authored-by: opencode/tech-writer <tech-writer@agents.invalid>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import logging
|
||||
from datetime import date, datetime, time
|
||||
from typing import override
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -153,6 +154,42 @@ def test_exact_match() -> None:
|
||||
assert result.changes == ()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 4bis: Seconds ignored in modification detection ====================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_seconds_ignored_in_modification_detection() -> None:
|
||||
"""Real with seconds and theoretical without → same minutes → no MODIFIED.
|
||||
|
||||
The real lesson starts at 10:00:30 and ends at 11:00:45 while the
|
||||
theoretical lesson is at 10:00–11:00. The minute-level times match (10:00
|
||||
and 11:00), so the real lesson matches the theoretical one within the
|
||||
±15 min tolerance and is NOT marked MODIFIED despite the differing seconds.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [
|
||||
TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo_1",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(10, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(11, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
real_lessons = [
|
||||
Lesson(
|
||||
id="real_1",
|
||||
start=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 10, 0, 30),
|
||||
end=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 11, 0, 45),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
provider = _StubProvider(theoretical_lessons)
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(provider)
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert result.changes == ()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 5: Within tolerance (±14 min) ====================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -323,11 +360,11 @@ def test_different_normalized_subjects() -> None:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_multi_candidate_selection_by_id() -> None:
|
||||
"""Two theoretical candidates match one real → select the smaller id (theo_a).
|
||||
"""1 real / 2 identical theoretical → the non-selected theoretical is REMOVED.
|
||||
|
||||
theo_a (smaller id) has teachers identical to the real lesson (no MODIFIED);
|
||||
theo_b (larger id) has different teachers and would trigger MODIFIED if selected.
|
||||
A zero-change diff therefore proves theo_a was selected.
|
||||
Two theoretical candidates match one real; the real selects theo_a (the
|
||||
smaller id, identical teachers → no MODIFIED). theo_b (larger id) is not
|
||||
selected and, being unmatched, must be REMOVED.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [
|
||||
TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
@@ -361,8 +398,11 @@ def test_multi_candidate_selection_by_id() -> None:
|
||||
provider = _StubProvider(theoretical_lessons)
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(provider)
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
# theo_a (smaller id) selected with identical teachers → no MODIFIED; theo_b matched by existence → not REMOVED
|
||||
assert result.changes == ()
|
||||
# theo_a (smaller id) selected with identical teachers → no change; theo_b unmatched → REMOVED
|
||||
assert len(result.changes) == 1
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].type == AgendaChangeType.REMOVED
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].lesson is None
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].theoretical_lesson == theoretical_lessons[0] # theo_b
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 11: MODIFIED — teachers differ (order-insensitive) ====================
|
||||
@@ -428,7 +468,7 @@ def test_teachers_differ_different_sets() -> None:
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert len(result.changes) == 1
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].type == AgendaChangeType.MODIFIED
|
||||
assert "professeurs: {'Mme Martin'} → {'M. Dupont'}" in result.changes[0].details
|
||||
assert "professeurs: ['Mme Martin'] → ['M. Dupont']" in result.changes[0].details
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 13: MODIFIED — rooms differ ====================
|
||||
@@ -462,10 +502,112 @@ def test_rooms_differ() -> None:
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert len(result.changes) == 1
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].type == AgendaChangeType.MODIFIED
|
||||
assert "salles: {'Salle 15'} → {'Salle 12'}" in result.changes[0].details
|
||||
assert "salles: ['Salle 15'] → ['Salle 12']" in result.changes[0].details
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 14: MODIFIED — status != NORMAL ====================
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 14: Deterministic teachers formatting ====================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_teachers_sorted_in_details() -> None:
|
||||
"""Multiple teachers → details list sorted alphabetically regardless of input order."""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [
|
||||
TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo_1",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(10, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(11, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
teachers=("Chloe", "Alice", "Bob"),
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
real_lessons = [
|
||||
Lesson(
|
||||
id="real_1",
|
||||
start=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 10, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 11, 0, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
teachers=("Bob", "Chloe"),
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
provider = _StubProvider(theoretical_lessons)
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(provider)
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert len(result.changes) == 1
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].type == AgendaChangeType.MODIFIED
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].details == "professeurs: ['Alice', 'Bob', 'Chloe'] → ['Bob', 'Chloe']"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 15: Deterministic rooms formatting ====================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rooms_sorted_in_details() -> None:
|
||||
"""Multiple rooms → details list sorted alphabetically regardless of input order."""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [
|
||||
TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo_1",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(10, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(11, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
rooms=("C101", "A102", "B103"),
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
real_lessons = [
|
||||
Lesson(
|
||||
id="real_1",
|
||||
start=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 10, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 11, 0, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
rooms=("B103", "C101"),
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
provider = _StubProvider(theoretical_lessons)
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(provider)
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert len(result.changes) == 1
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].type == AgendaChangeType.MODIFIED
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].details == "salles: ['A102', 'B103', 'C101'] → ['B103', 'C101']"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 16: Inter-process deterministic details ====================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_details_deterministic_sorted_exact() -> None:
|
||||
"""MODIFIED details are exactly sorted, independent of teachers input order."""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [
|
||||
TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo_1",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(10, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(11, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
teachers=("Alice", "Bob"),
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
real_lessons = [
|
||||
Lesson(
|
||||
id="real_1",
|
||||
start=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 10, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 11, 0, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
teachers=("Bob", "Alice", "Chloe"),
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
provider = _StubProvider(theoretical_lessons)
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(provider)
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert len(result.changes) == 1
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].type == AgendaChangeType.MODIFIED
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].details == "professeurs: ['Alice', 'Bob'] → ['Alice', 'Bob', 'Chloe']"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 17: MODIFIED — status != NORMAL ====================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_status_not_normal() -> None:
|
||||
@@ -502,7 +644,11 @@ def test_status_not_normal() -> None:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_removed_by_existence_not_selection() -> None:
|
||||
"""Two theoretical match one real; real selects the smaller id; the other theoretical is a candidate (exists) → NOT REMOVED."""
|
||||
"""1 real / 2 identical theoretical → the unmatched theoretical is REMOVED.
|
||||
|
||||
The matching is one-to-one: the real consumes theo_a (smaller id) and theo_b
|
||||
remains available, hence REMOVED even though it is a candidate by existence.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [
|
||||
TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo_a",
|
||||
@@ -532,8 +678,11 @@ def test_removed_by_existence_not_selection() -> None:
|
||||
provider = _StubProvider(theoretical_lessons)
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(provider)
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
# Both theoretical lessons are candidates (matched by existence), so neither is REMOVED
|
||||
assert len(result.changes) == 0
|
||||
# theo_a (smaller id) matched → no change; theo_b unmatched → REMOVED
|
||||
assert len(result.changes) == 1
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].type == AgendaChangeType.REMOVED
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].lesson is None
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].theoretical_lesson == theoretical_lessons[1] # theo_b
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 16: Deterministic order ====================
|
||||
@@ -638,3 +787,172 @@ def test_idempotence() -> None:
|
||||
result1 = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
result2 = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert result1 == result2
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 18: 2 reals identical / 1 theoretical → 1 ADDED ====================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_two_reals_one_theoretical_added() -> None:
|
||||
"""2 identical reals / 1 matching theoretical → the surplus real is ADDED.
|
||||
|
||||
The real with the smaller id is matched to the theoretical; the real with
|
||||
the larger id has no remaining candidate and must be ADDED.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [
|
||||
TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo_1",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(10, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(11, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
real_lessons = [
|
||||
Lesson(
|
||||
id="real_b",
|
||||
start=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 10, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 11, 0, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
),
|
||||
Lesson(
|
||||
id="real_a",
|
||||
start=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 10, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 11, 0, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
provider = _StubProvider(theoretical_lessons)
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(provider)
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
# real_a (smaller id) matched to theo_1; real_b (larger id) unmatched → ADDED
|
||||
assert len(result.changes) == 1
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].type == AgendaChangeType.ADDED
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].lesson == real_lessons[0] # real_b
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].theoretical_lesson is None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ==================== Test Case 19: Order stability ====================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_order_stability() -> None:
|
||||
"""Presenting real lessons in different orders yields the same result."""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [
|
||||
TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo_1",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(10, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(11, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
real_a = Lesson(
|
||||
id="real_a",
|
||||
start=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 10, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 11, 0, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
real_b = Lesson(
|
||||
id="real_b",
|
||||
start=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 10, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2025, 9, 15, 11, 0, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
teachers=("M. Dupont",),
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
provider = _StubProvider(theoretical_lessons)
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(provider)
|
||||
result_ab = comparator.compare([real_a, real_b], TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
result_ba = comparator.compare([real_b, real_a], TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
# real_a matched to theo_1 (no change); real_b unmatched → ADDED
|
||||
assert result_ab == result_ba
|
||||
assert len(result_ab.changes) == 1
|
||||
assert result_ab.changes[0].type == AgendaChangeType.ADDED
|
||||
assert result_ab.changes[0].lesson == real_b
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ============ Test Case 20: Off-target-date real lesson is strictly filtered ============
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _theoretical_monday() -> TheoreticalLesson:
|
||||
"""Theoretical Monday 10:00–11:00 in Mathematics."""
|
||||
return TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo_1",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(10, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(11, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _real_lesson(lesson_id: str, day: int, hour: int) -> Lesson:
|
||||
"""Real lesson on 2025-09-15+``day`` days at ``hour``:00–:60."""
|
||||
return Lesson(
|
||||
id=lesson_id,
|
||||
start=datetime(2025, 9, 15 + day, hour, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2025, 9, 15 + day, hour + 1, 0, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_off_date_real_does_not_match() -> None:
|
||||
"""A real on Tuesday must not match a theoretical Monday → REMOVED, no ADDED.
|
||||
|
||||
The Tuesday real is filtered out (never produces ADDED) and the Monday
|
||||
theoretical, having no matching real, is REMOVED.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [_theoretical_monday()]
|
||||
real_lessons = [_real_lesson("real_tue", day=1, hour=10)] # Tuesday 2025-09-16
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(_StubProvider(theoretical_lessons))
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert len(result.changes) == 1
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].type == AgendaChangeType.REMOVED
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].lesson is None
|
||||
assert result.changes[0].theoretical_lesson == theoretical_lessons[0]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_off_date_filtered_and_in_date_matched() -> None:
|
||||
"""A Tuesday real is ignored while a Monday real still matches the theoretical.
|
||||
|
||||
The Tuesday real is excluded; the Monday real pairs with the theoretical, so
|
||||
the theoretical is not REMOVED and the on-date real produces no change.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [_theoretical_monday()]
|
||||
real_lessons = [
|
||||
_real_lesson("real_tue", day=1, hour=14), # Tuesday, off target date
|
||||
_real_lesson("real_mon", day=0, hour=10), # Monday, on target date
|
||||
]
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(_StubProvider(theoretical_lessons))
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert result.changes == ()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_off_date_real_logs_warning(caplog: pytest.LogCaptureFixture) -> None:
|
||||
"""An off-target-date real lesson logs a warning containing its id."""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [_theoretical_monday()]
|
||||
real_lessons = [_real_lesson("real_out", day=1, hour=10)]
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(_StubProvider(theoretical_lessons))
|
||||
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING):
|
||||
comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert any("real_out" in record.message for record in caplog.records)
|
||||
assert all(record.levelno >= logging.WARNING for record in caplog.records)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_nominal_matching_produces_no_change() -> None:
|
||||
"""An identical Monday real / Monday theoretical pair yields an empty diff.
|
||||
|
||||
Confirms the strict date filtering does not break the nominal case.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
theoretical_lessons = [_theoretical_monday()]
|
||||
real_lessons = [_real_lesson("real_mon", day=0, hour=10)]
|
||||
comparator = AgendaComparator(_StubProvider(theoretical_lessons))
|
||||
result = comparator.compare(real_lessons, TARGET_DATE)
|
||||
assert result.changes == ()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -150,7 +150,15 @@ from pronote_sync.models.xmpp import XmppMessage
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
),
|
||||
theoretical_lesson=None,
|
||||
theoretical_lesson=TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo-lesson-004",
|
||||
day_of_week=4,
|
||||
start_time=time(16, 0, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(17, 30, 0),
|
||||
subject="SVT",
|
||||
teachers=("M. Lefèvre",),
|
||||
rooms=("Salle 302",),
|
||||
),
|
||||
),
|
||||
),
|
||||
"messages": (
|
||||
@@ -369,5 +377,11 @@ def test_agenda_change_type_enum_values() -> None:
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
),
|
||||
theoretical_lesson=None,
|
||||
theoretical_lesson=TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="test",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(8, 0, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(9, 0, 0),
|
||||
subject="Test",
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ class TestAgendaChangeConsistency:
|
||||
assert instance.theoretical_lesson is not None
|
||||
|
||||
def test_agenda_change_modified_with_lesson_valid(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Vérifie que type=MODIFIED avec lesson=<valide> est valide."""
|
||||
"""Vérifie que type=MODIFIED avec lesson et theoretical_lesson est valide."""
|
||||
lesson = Lesson(
|
||||
id="lesson-valid-mod",
|
||||
start=datetime(2024, 9, 6, 10, 0, 0),
|
||||
@@ -249,13 +249,97 @@ class TestAgendaChangeConsistency:
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
theoretical_lesson = TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo-lesson-valid-mod",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(10, 0, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(11, 30, 0),
|
||||
subject="Physique",
|
||||
)
|
||||
instance = AgendaChange(
|
||||
type=AgendaChangeType.MODIFIED,
|
||||
lesson=lesson,
|
||||
theoretical_lesson=None,
|
||||
theoretical_lesson=theoretical_lesson,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert instance.type == AgendaChangeType.MODIFIED
|
||||
assert instance.lesson is not None
|
||||
assert instance.theoretical_lesson is not None
|
||||
|
||||
def test_agenda_change_added_with_theoretical_lesson_invalid(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Vérifie que type=ADDED avec theoretical_lesson non-None lève une ValidationError."""
|
||||
lesson = Lesson(
|
||||
id="lesson-added-theo",
|
||||
start=datetime(2024, 9, 6, 8, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2024, 9, 6, 9, 30, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
theoretical_lesson = TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo-lesson-added",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(8, 0, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(9, 30, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc_info:
|
||||
AgendaChange(
|
||||
type=AgendaChangeType.ADDED,
|
||||
lesson=lesson,
|
||||
theoretical_lesson=theoretical_lesson,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert any(
|
||||
"theoretical_lesson doit être None pour le type" in str(error)
|
||||
for error in exc_info.value.errors()
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_agenda_change_removed_with_lesson_invalid(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Vérifie que type=REMOVED avec lesson non-None lève une ValidationError."""
|
||||
lesson = Lesson(
|
||||
id="lesson-removed",
|
||||
start=datetime(2024, 9, 6, 8, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2024, 9, 6, 9, 30, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
theoretical_lesson = TheoreticalLesson(
|
||||
id="theo-lesson-removed",
|
||||
day_of_week=0,
|
||||
start_time=time(8, 0, 0),
|
||||
end_time=time(9, 30, 0),
|
||||
subject="Mathématiques",
|
||||
)
|
||||
with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc_info:
|
||||
AgendaChange(
|
||||
type=AgendaChangeType.REMOVED,
|
||||
lesson=lesson,
|
||||
theoretical_lesson=theoretical_lesson,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert any(
|
||||
"lesson doit être None pour le type" in str(error) for error in exc_info.value.errors()
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_agenda_change_modified_without_theoretical_lesson_invalid(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Vérifie que type=MODIFIED sans theoretical_lesson lève une ValidationError."""
|
||||
lesson = Lesson(
|
||||
id="lesson-mod-no-theo",
|
||||
start=datetime(2024, 9, 6, 10, 0, 0),
|
||||
end=datetime(2024, 9, 6, 11, 30, 0),
|
||||
subject="Physique",
|
||||
group=None,
|
||||
content=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc_info:
|
||||
AgendaChange(
|
||||
type=AgendaChangeType.MODIFIED,
|
||||
lesson=lesson,
|
||||
theoretical_lesson=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert any(
|
||||
"theoretical_lesson est requis pour le type" in str(error)
|
||||
for error in exc_info.value.errors()
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestCalDAVSyncResultInvariants:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user